trains
Traveling in the height of c. 1910 luxury!
Submitted by murph on 24 July 2007 - 8:55pm. amtrak | montana | trains | transportationWe've been hoping to take a trip to Montana in the next couple of months, once Cara is free of classes for more than a week at a time. Plane tickets don't seem to be getting below about $550/ea, though, and, since N'western is just about the only way to get there, there's no guarantee our flight would actually go anyways.
So I decided to look into Amtrak. I've taken Amtrak to MT and back before, and it's not a bad trip - really, more relaxing than the same trip by car, and much more comfortable than flying (the fact that it takes 32 hours by train, compared to 8-10 flying, makes the two modes about equal in my book, assuming I'm planning a decent vacation). One Amtrak trip was, in fact, where I met my friend Kenzi - nothing like sharing a seat for the 8 hour Mini-no-place to Chicago stretch with someone to get a feel for whether or not they are a psycho killer. (My vote: not, hence my first foray into blogging activism, five years ago now.)

Recent comments
3 weeks 1 day ago
3 weeks 1 day ago
3 weeks 2 days ago
3 weeks 2 days ago
3 weeks 4 days ago
3 weeks 4 days ago
5 weeks 1 day ago
6 weeks 1 day ago
7 weeks 1 day ago
7 weeks 1 day ago