The political bubble of the Ann Arbor News

| |

In an Ann Arbor News letter to the editor this past week, an Ann Arborite stated the following hope:

We need solution to health care woes

So, same-sex partners can no longer enjoy the benefits of their partner's employer health plans. Truly sad. However, I see the situation on another level. What of the growing numbers of the self-employed, the unemployed and the underemployed who are unable to enjoy the largess of a deep-pocketed employer? While many same-sex partners have been enjoying employer-provided health care, others have been left out in the cold, some for years. Now that same-sex couples have joined these ranks, perhaps it will become apparent to all of us that we as a society need a better solution to health care, one that does not depend upon how and where one is employed. (Emphasis added.)

This really demonstrates to me the skew one finds in a town like Ann Arbor - the idea that Proposal 2's striking down of the benefits given same-sex partners of University of Michigan and Ann Arbor Public Schools employees will provide the tipping point for America to wake up and provide health care to all seems pretty hopeful to me. As far as I can tell, the court case hasn't even really provided a tipping point in the state for the idea that Prop 2 was a bad idea, let alone that our health care system is broken. But, hey, at least the economic impacts of (a) discriminatory ballot proposals and (b) lack of health care are getting coverage.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Take health insurance off the employer's back

I by no means have any real knowledge or schooling on the subject, but I always thought it was odd that employers provide health care coverage to employees as a benefit. I believe I heard that it started some time after world war II or something, as an incentive to bring on new employees.

It would make more sense that health insurance be handled by an agent, like the same guy who helps arrange your car and house insurance - guiding you towards a company that offered the best coverage for your situation and for your dollar. Why continue to saddle employers with the hassle just because it's how it's always been (lately)?

I haven't bothered to flesh out the ramifications or downsides of this idea, but I'm sure there are some.