Cost effectiveness

I vaguely remember a spate of articles a little while ago about how desalination plants had become a more cost-effective hypothetical water supply for California/Nevada than a Great Lakes pipeline. Colorado is probably still SOL. A brief google, though, shows that folks in Alabama are now talking Great Lakes pipeline. That's a little more geo/topographically realistic. (Wouldn't a Memphis->Birmingham pipeline be shorter and cheaper, though?)

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
More information about formatting options