Cost effectiveness
Submitted by murph on 23 October 2007 - 11:54am.
I vaguely remember a spate of articles a little while ago about how desalination plants had become a more cost-effective hypothetical water supply for California/Nevada than a Great Lakes pipeline. Colorado is probably still SOL. A brief google, though, shows that folks in Alabama are now talking Great Lakes pipeline. That's a little more geo/topographically realistic. (Wouldn't a Memphis->Birmingham pipeline be shorter and cheaper, though?)
»

Recent comments
1 year 4 weeks ago
1 year 5 weeks ago
1 year 5 weeks ago
1 year 8 weeks ago
1 year 8 weeks ago
1 year 9 weeks ago
1 year 9 weeks ago
1 year 9 weeks ago
1 year 9 weeks ago
1 year 9 weeks ago